Rehabilitation of Amputations in Disasters and Conflicts: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 52: Line 52:
Life saving is a primary purpose of limb amputation during the disaster as the wounds sustained at the battlefield usually presents with extensive soft tissue damage, and delayed injury- to- operation time. These are high-energy wounds as compared to wounds sustained during other mass-casualty events (eg. earthquake) which are characterised by low-energy injury, extensive soft tissue damage and late presentation.  
Life saving is a primary purpose of limb amputation during the disaster as the wounds sustained at the battlefield usually presents with extensive soft tissue damage, and delayed injury- to- operation time. These are high-energy wounds as compared to wounds sustained during other mass-casualty events (eg. earthquake) which are characterised by low-energy injury, extensive soft tissue damage and late presentation.  


=== Transport and Early Stabilisation ===
Prehospital field amputations may improve patient outcome<ref>Yang C, Ross W, Peterson M. [https://www.jems.com/patient-care/hand-entrapment/ Prehospital field amputation leads to improved patient outcome]. J Emerg Med Serv. 2018;43.</ref>
In the emergency and disaster medicine literature, it’s generally accepted to amputate the limb as distally as possible.4,6,7 This is consistent with the steering committee recommendations set forth in 2011 by the International Search and Rescue Advisory Group (INSARAG).
=== Definitive Management ===
increased risk of infection and higher levels of amputation<ref name=":0" />
*  
*  


Line 62: Line 69:


==== Considerations for Amputations ====
==== Considerations for Amputations ====
Prehospital field amputations may improve patient outcome<ref>Yang C, Ross W, Peterson M. [https://www.jems.com/patient-care/hand-entrapment/ Prehospital field amputation leads to improved patient outcome]. J Emerg Med Serv. 2018;43.</ref>
In the emergency and disaster medicine literature, it’s generally accepted to amputate the limb as distally as possible.4,6,7 This is consistent with the steering committee recommendations set forth in 2011 by the International Search and Rescue Advisory Group (INSARAG).
principles of trauma care such as rapid triage, transport, early stabilisation and definitive management is critically important in disaster situations. Battlefield extremity wounds are typically characterised by high-energy injury, extensive soft-tissue damage<ref name=":0" />and prolonged injury-to-operation time. During earthquakes and other mass-casualty events, the mechanism of injury is primarily low-energy, prolonged, crushing trauma, with extensive soft tissue damage and late presentation.Both these varieties of factors lead to an increased risk of infection and higher levels of amputation<ref name=":0" />
Trauma complications:
Trauma complications:



Revision as of 04:14, 1 March 2022

Welcome to Rehabilitation in Disaster and Conflict Situations Content Development Project. Please do not edit unless you are involved in this project, but please come back in the near future to check out new information!! If you would like to get involved in this project and earn accreditation for your contributions, please get in touch!

Original Editors - Add your name/s here if you are the original editor/s of this page.  User Name

Top Contributors - Ewa Jaraczewska, Naomi O'Reilly, Kim Jackson, Arnold Fredrick D'Souza, Jess Bell, Tony Lowe and Tarina van der Stockt      

Introduction[edit | edit source]

Natural disasters and mass casualties that occur during military conflicts or industrial accidents can cause musculoskeletal trauma among military and civilian populations involved in these disasters.[1]As a result of crush injury, crush syndrome or compartment syndrome a different than non-disaster approach to amputations may be warrant. [1]

Types of Amputations[edit | edit source]

The level of amputation defines different types of lower and upper limbs amputations.

Upper Limb Amputations[edit | edit source]

Shoulder level:

  • Shoulder disarticualtion
  • Amputation of the arm, scapula and clavical (Forequater)

Elbow level:

  • Above elbow (Transhumeral)
  • Elbow disarticulation
  • Below elbow (Transradial)

Wrist and Hand level:

  • Partial hand (Transcarpal)
  • Hand and Wrist disarticulation

Lower Limb Amputations[edit | edit source]

Hip level:

  • Hip disarticulation
  • Amputation of the leg and pelvis (Hemipelvectomy)

Knee level:

  • Above knee amputation (Transfemoral)
  • Knee disarticulation
  • Below knee amputation (Transtibial)

Foot and Ankle:

  • Ankle dysarticulation
  • Partial foot (Chopart)
  • Syme's

Initial Trauma Care[edit | edit source]

In disaster situations the following principles of trauma care are often critical: rapid triage, transport, early stabilisation, and definitive management.

Rapid Triage[edit | edit source]

Life saving is a primary purpose of limb amputation during the disaster as the wounds sustained at the battlefield usually presents with extensive soft tissue damage, and delayed injury- to- operation time. These are high-energy wounds as compared to wounds sustained during other mass-casualty events (eg. earthquake) which are characterised by low-energy injury, extensive soft tissue damage and late presentation.

Transport and Early Stabilisation[edit | edit source]

Prehospital field amputations may improve patient outcome[2]

In the emergency and disaster medicine literature, it’s generally accepted to amputate the limb as distally as possible.4,6,7 This is consistent with the steering committee recommendations set forth in 2011 by the International Search and Rescue Advisory Group (INSARAG).

Definitive Management[edit | edit source]

increased risk of infection and higher levels of amputation[1]

Medical and Surgical Intervention Considerations[edit | edit source]

Considerations for Amputations[edit | edit source]

Trauma complications:

  • crush injury
  • crush syndrome Crush syndrome (CS) is a condition with a high morbidity and mortality due to severe electrolyte disorders, circulatory dysfunction and multiple organ failure, secondary to severe rhabdomyolysis and reperfusion injuries. There is controversy about the role of fasciotomy in the treatment of compartment syndromes due to crush injuries and it is still unknown if early amputation has patient-centered benefits.[3]
  • compartment syndrome

Healing Considerations[edit | edit source]

Assessment Considerations[edit | edit source]

Treatment Considerations[edit | edit source]

Add your content to this page here!

Resources[edit | edit source]

References [edit | edit source]

see adding references tutorial

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Wolfson N. Amputations in natural disasters and mass casualties: staged approach. Int Orthop. 2012 Oct;36(10):1983-8.
  2. Yang C, Ross W, Peterson M. Prehospital field amputation leads to improved patient outcome. J Emerg Med Serv. 2018;43.
  3. Arango-Granados MC, Mendoza DF, Cadavid AE, Marín AF. Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2020 Jan 1;72:346-50.