Oswestry Disability Index: Difference between revisions
Rachael Lowe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Rachael Lowe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Objective<br> == | == Objective<br> == | ||
Patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in those rehabilitating from low back pain. Suitable for the English speaking population only. <br> | |||
== Intended Population<br> == | == Intended Population<br> == | ||
Acute or chronic low back pain. Most effective for persistent severe disability<ref>Davies, Claire C.1; Nitz, Arthur J. [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/ptr/2009/00000014/00000006/art00005 Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review]. Physical Therapy Reviews, Volume 14, Number 6, December 2009 , pp. 399-408(10)</ref> | |||
== Method of Use == | == Method of Use == | ||
Questionnaire examines perceived level of disability in 10 everyday activities of daily living.<br> | |||
== Reference<br> == | == Reference<br> == | ||
Fairbank J, Davies J, Couper J, OBrien J (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire Physiotherapy 66, 8, 271-273 <br> | |||
== Evidence == | == Evidence == | ||
=== Reliability === | === Reliability === | ||
The ODI addresses a broader concept of disability than that directly related to pain intensity<ref>Gronblad M, Hupli M et al (1989) [http://journals.lww.com/clinicalpain/Abstract/1993/09000/Intel_correlation_and_Test_Retest_Reliability_of.6.aspx Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the pain disability index and the Oswestry disability questionnaire and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients] The Clinical Journal of Pain 9, 189-195.</ref>.<br> | |||
=== Validity === | === Validity === | ||
Fisher K, Johnston M (1997) Validation of the ODQ, its sensitivity as a measure of change following treatment and its relationship with other aspects of the chronic pain experience Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 13, 67-80 <br> | |||
=== Responsiveness === | === Responsiveness === | ||
Bolton JE, Fish RG (1997) Responsiveness of the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire Eur J Chiropractic 45, 1, 9-14<br> | |||
=== Miscellaneous<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;" class="Apple-style-span"></span><br> === | === Miscellaneous<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal;" class="Apple-style-span"></span><br> === | ||
== | == Resources<br> == | ||
Baker D, Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT (1989) The Oswestry disability index revisited: its reliability, repeatability, and validity, and a comparison with St Thomas Disability Index. In Roland MO, Jenner JR eds (1989) Back Pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. New York, NY. Manchester University Press 174-186<br> | |||
== Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | == Recent Related Research (from [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ Pubmed]) == | ||
<div class="researchbox"> | <div class="researchbox"> | ||
<rss> | <rss>http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1JIsr3YNQVWUuN9J71GLUGPhWciGG1xwUe9sRFlUtFPW7A_wdT|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10</rss> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 12:34, 22 February 2010
Original Editor - Your name will be added here if you created the original content for this page.
Lead Editors - Your name will be added here if you are a lead editor on this page. Read more.
Objective
[edit | edit source]
Patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in those rehabilitating from low back pain. Suitable for the English speaking population only.
Intended Population
[edit | edit source]
Acute or chronic low back pain. Most effective for persistent severe disability[1]
Method of Use[edit | edit source]
Questionnaire examines perceived level of disability in 10 everyday activities of daily living.
Reference
[edit | edit source]
Fairbank J, Davies J, Couper J, OBrien J (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire Physiotherapy 66, 8, 271-273
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Reliability[edit | edit source]
The ODI addresses a broader concept of disability than that directly related to pain intensity[2].
Validity[edit | edit source]
Fisher K, Johnston M (1997) Validation of the ODQ, its sensitivity as a measure of change following treatment and its relationship with other aspects of the chronic pain experience Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 13, 67-80
Responsiveness[edit | edit source]
Bolton JE, Fish RG (1997) Responsiveness of the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire Eur J Chiropractic 45, 1, 9-14
Miscellaneous
[edit | edit source]
Resources
[edit | edit source]
Baker D, Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT (1989) The Oswestry disability index revisited: its reliability, repeatability, and validity, and a comparison with St Thomas Disability Index. In Roland MO, Jenner JR eds (1989) Back Pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. New York, NY. Manchester University Press 174-186
Recent Related Research (from Pubmed)[edit | edit source]
Failed to load RSS feed from http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/erss.cgi?rss_guid=1JIsr3YNQVWUuN9J71GLUGPhWciGG1xwUe9sRFlUtFPW7A_wdT|charset=UTF-8|short|max=10: Error parsing XML for RSS
References[edit | edit source]
References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.
- ↑ Davies, Claire C.1; Nitz, Arthur J. Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review. Physical Therapy Reviews, Volume 14, Number 6, December 2009 , pp. 399-408(10)
- ↑ Gronblad M, Hupli M et al (1989) Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the pain disability index and the Oswestry disability questionnaire and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients The Clinical Journal of Pain 9, 189-195.
