U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

Cover of StatPearls

StatPearls [Internet].

Show details

Creatine Phosphokinase

; ; .

Author Information and Affiliations

Last Update: February 27, 2024.

Introduction

Creatine phosphokinase (CPK), also known as creatine kinase (CK), is the enzyme that catalyzes the reaction of creatine and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to phosphocreatine (PCr) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP).[1] This CK enzyme reaction is reversible; ATP can be generated from PCr and ADP. The phosphocreatine created from this reaction is used to supply tissues and cells that require substantial amounts of ATP, like the brain, skeletal muscles, and the heart.[2] CK is a central regulator of cellular energy homeostasis. Many conditions can cause derangement in CK levels, including rhabdomyolysis, heart disease, kidney disease, or medications.[3] As such, it is a diagnostic indicator for specifically rhabdomyolysis and acute myocardial infarction (AMI), among other medical disorders.

Pathophysiology

Creatine kinase (CK) is a compact enzyme of around 82 kDa found in both the cytosol and mitochondria of tissues with high energy demands.[4] In the cytosol, CK comprises 2 polypeptide subunits of around 42 kDa, and 2 subunits are found: M (muscle type) and B (brain type).[5] The genes for these subunits are located on different chromosomes: B on 14q32 and M on 19q13. These subunits allow the formation of 3 tissue-specific isoenzymes: CPK-MB (cardiac muscle), CPK-MM (skeletal muscle), and CPK-BB (brain).

Typically, the ratio of subunits varies with muscle type: skeletal muscle (98% MM to 2% MB), cardiac muscle (70% to 80% MM and 20% to 30% MB), while the brain predominantly has the isoenzyme BB.[6] In mitochondria, 2 specific forms of CK exist: Mt-CK, a non-sarcomeric type called ubiquitous Mt-CK expressed in various tissues such as the brain, smooth muscle, and sperm, and a sarcomeric Mt-CK expressed in cardiac and skeletal muscle. The mitochondrial CK isoform is an octamer consisting of 4 dimers each.[7] While mitochondrial CK is directly involved in forming PCr from mitochondrial ATP, cytosolic CK regenerates ATP from ADP using PCr. This happens at intracellular sites where ATP is used in the cell, with CK acting as an in situ ATP regenerator.

Mt-CK and cytosolic CK are connected in a so-called PCr/Cr-shuttle or circuit.[8] PCr generated by Mt-CK in mitochondria is shuttled to cytosolic CK that is coupled to ATP-dependent processes, eg, ATPases, such as actomyosin ATPase and calcium ATPase involved in muscle contraction, and sodium/potassium ATPase involved in sodium retention in the kidney.[9] The bound cytosolic CK accepts PCr shuttled through the cell and uses ADP to regenerate ATP, which the ATPases use as an energy source (CK is associated with the ATPases, forming a coupled microcompartment).[10] PCr is a buffer and transporter between subcellular sites of energy production (mitochondria and glycolysis) and energy utilization (ATPases).[11]

Typically, CK is available in heart tissue, skeletal muscles, the brain, etc. However, upon muscular injury, leakage of CK into the bloodstream occurs. Thus, CK is indicative of muscular damage. CPK-MB is a more specific indicator of myocardial muscle damage, while CPK-MM is more indicative of skeletal muscle damage.[12] CK activity in the serum of healthy people is almost exclusively due to MM activity (though small amounts of CPK-MB may be present) due to the physiological turnover of muscle tissue.[13]

When electrophoresed, CPK-MM runs closest to the cathode, CPK-MB has intermediate mobility, and CPK-BB moves farthest from the point of application toward the anode. Mt-CK, which runs more cathodal than the MM fraction, is usually associated with tissue necrosis that accompanies severe anoxic shock and liver disease.[14] CK activity is also found in a macromolecular form—the so-called macro-CK. Macro-CK is transiently found in sera of up to 6% of hospitalized patients, but only a small proportion of these have increased CK activities in serum.[15] The enzyme exists in 2 forms, types 1 and 2. Macro-CK type 1 is a complex of CK, typically CK-BB, and an immunoglobulin, commonly IgG.[16] Macro-CK type 1 is usually seen in women aged older than 50. Macro-CK type 2 is oligomeric Mt-CK found in severely ill adults with malignancies or children with tissue distress.[17]

Both M and B subunits have a C-terminal lysine residue, but only the former is hydrolyzed by the action of carboxypeptidases present in the blood. Carboxypeptidases B or N sequentially hydrolyze the lysine residues from CKMM to produce 2 CK-MM isoforms—CK-MM2 (1 lysine residue removed) and CK-MM1 (both lysine residues removed).[18]

The loss of positively charged lysine produces a more negatively charged CK molecule with greater anodic mobility at electrophoresis. Because CK-MB has only 1 M subunit, the dimer coded by the M and B genes is CK-MB2, and the lysine-hydrolyzed dimer is CK-MB1. The assay of the CK isoforms requires special techniques, such as high-voltage electrophoresis (with gel cooling), HPLC, chromatofocusing, or immunoassay.[19]

Specimen Requirements and Procedure

Specimens for CK analysis include serum and plasma heparin. Other than heparin, anticoagulants should not be used in collection tubes because they inhibit CK activity. The collection of specimens in gel separator tubes does not appear to affect CK activity compared to tubes without gel.[20] CK activity in serum is relatively unstable and lost during storage. Average stabilities are less than 8 hours at room temperature, 48 hours at 4 ºC, and 1 month at −20 ºC.[21] Therefore, the serum specimen should be stored at −80 Cº if the analysis is delayed for more than 30 days. 

Since less risk of hemolysis is present, fresh serum is the preferred specimen for analysis of the CK isoenzyme pattern.[22] Of the 3 commonly seen isoenzymes, CK-BB activity is the least stable. Adding a thiol such as 2-mercaptoethanol to the serum improves its stability. CK-MB activity is not significantly reduced when the separated serum is stored for up to 48 hours at 4 ºC or 1 month at −20 ºC. Since the mass measurement is not subject to the loss of enzymatic activity, CK-MB protein concentration in serum is stable for weeks when the specimen is stored under refrigeration and for several years if stored at −20 ºC.[23]

Testing Procedures

Numerous photometric, fluorometric, and coupled-enzyme methods have been developed for the assay of CK activity, using either the forward (Cr --> CRP) or the reverse (Cr <-- CRP) reaction.[24] All commercial assays for total CK are based on the reverse reaction that proceeds about 6 times faster than the forward reaction. The ATP produced is measured by hexokinase (HK) or glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) coupled reactions that convert NADP+ to NADPH, monitored spectrophotometrically at 340 nm.[4] The increase in absorbance is a measure of CK activity present in the specimen.

Electrophoresis and various immunological methods are commonly used to analyze CK isoenzyme.[25] Electrophoretic methods help separate all of the CK isoenzymes. The isoenzyme bands are visualized by incubating the support (eg, agarose or cellulose acetate) with a concentrated CK assay mixture using the reverse reaction.

The NADPH formed in this reaction is detected by observing the bluish-white fluorescence after excitation by long-wave (360 nm) ultraviolet light. NADPH may be quantified by fluorescence densitometry, which detects bands of 2 to 5 U/L. The mobility of CK isoenzymes at pH 8.6 toward the anode is BB > MB > MM, with the MM remaining cathodic to the point of application.[26] The discriminating power of electrophoresis also allows the detection of abnormal CK bands (eg, macro-CK). The disadvantages of electrophoresis include the long turnaround time, labor intensity, incompatibility with clinical chemistry analyzers in emergencies, and required interpretative skills.[27]

Immunochemical methods apply to the direct measurement of CK-MB. In the immunoinhibition technique, an anti-CK-M subunit antiserum is used to inhibit both M subunits of CK-MM and the single M subunit of CK-MB, determining the enzyme activity of the B subunit of CK-MB, the B subunits of CK-BB, and macro-CKs. This technique assumes the absence of CK-BB (and other sources of interference such as macro-CKs) from the tested serum to determine CK-MB.[28] Because the CK-B subunit accounts for half the CK-MB activity, the change in absorbance should be doubled to obtain the measure of CK-MB activity. This results in a significant decrease in the analytical sensitivity of the method. If present, atypical macro-CK may result in falsely elevated CK-MB results. Owing to its low sensitivity and specificity, the immunoinhibition technique is supplanted mainly by mass assays of CK-MB.[29]

In contrast with immunoinhibition, which measures the CK-MB isoenzyme by determination of its catalytic activity, mass immunoassays measure CK-MB protein concentrations.[30] Several mass assays using various labels are now commercially available and used for routine CK-MB determination. Measurements use the “sandwich” technique, where the antibody specifically recognizes the MB dimer. The sandwich technique ensures that only CK-MB is estimated because neither CK-MM nor CK-BB reacts with both antibodies. Mass assays are more sensitive than activity-based methods, with a detection limit for CK-MB usually <1 μg/L.[31] Other advantages include sample stability, noninterference with hemolysis, drugs, or other catalytic activity inhibitors, full automation, and fast turnaround time.[32]

Interfering Factors

A moderate degree of hemolysis (up to 0.32 g/dL of hemoglobin) does not significantly influence the measured CK activity because erythrocytes contain no CK activity.[33] However, severely hemolyzed specimens are unsatisfactory because enzymes and intermediates (AK, ATP, and glucose-6-phosphate) liberated from the erythrocytes may affect the lag phase and the side reactions in the assay system. Turbid and icteric samples can be analyzed; appropriate values are obtained if the starting absorbance is not too high.[34]

Results, Reporting, and Critical Findings

Serum CK activity is subject to physiological variations. Sex, age, muscle mass, physical activity, and race all interact to affect measured serum activity. Males generally have a larger muscle mass, correlating to higher serum CK activities than females. The racial type also affects CK activities; the mean activity in white individuals is 66% of the activity in black individuals.[34] In white subjects, the reference interval is 46 to 171 U/L for males and 34 to 145 U/L for females when measured with an assay traceable to the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) 37 C reference procedure.

Newborns generally have higher CK activities resulting from skeletal muscle trauma during birth. Serum CK in infants decreases to the adult reference interval by 6 to 10 weeks. CK-BB may be elevated in neonates, particularly in newborns with brain-damaged or low birth weight.[35] The presence of CK-BB in blood, usually at low concentrations, may represent a physiological finding in the first days of life. The suggested upper reference limits when standardized methods for CK determination are employed are males up to 170 U/L and females up to 145 U/L. With the CK-MB mass assay, the upper reference limit for males is 5.0 μg/L, and the value for females is lower. However, many laboratories use the male reference interval.[36]

In populations who frequently exercise, such as well-trained, long-distance runners, the CK-MB content of skeletal muscle increases, which may produce abnormal serum CK-MB concentrations to separate non-myocardial infarction from myocardial infarction patients; a “relative index” (RI) is necessary.[37] The RI relates CK-MB mass concentration in μg/L to measured total CK activity in U/L.[38] Results are expressed as a percentage: physiological: ≤3%, equivocal: 3% to 5%, consistent with myocardial necrosis: >5%.[39] Blood sampling between 8 and 36 hours from symptom onset is necessary to use the RI.

Clinical Significance

CK activity is one of the markers of AMI.[40] The activity rises within 12 hours of AMI symptoms, peaks at 24 to 36 hours, and normalizes after 48 to 72 hours (see Image. Creatine Kinase Levels After a Myocardial Infarction). The issue with measuring CK activity for AMI is that it is non-specific to the heart. CK activity can increase in several conditions, such as rhabdomyolysis, chronic muscle diseases, burns, and strenuous exercise.[41] Although the CK-MB measurement is a diagnostic improvement over just CK, the enzyme can still increase in other conditions such as acute muscle injury, congestive cardiac failure, and arrhythmias.[42]

Elevated CK-MB levels have long indicated the diagnosis of AMI. Although many centers are utilizing troponin levels instead of CK-MB, a newer, more specific CK-MB analysis method is used.[43] The new testing method involves measuring the values of the CK-MB1 and CK-MB2 isoforms. In a normal patient, the ratio of CK-MB2 to CK-MB1 should be 1 to 1. In the case of AMI, the ratio peaks within 4 hours of the infarction. However, some evidence of AMI can be detected as early as 1 to 2 hours after the infarction.[44] To diagnose AMI, the ratio of CK-MB2 to CK-MB1 should be greater than 1.7 to 1. However, a ratio greater than or equal to 1.5 to 1 strongly indicates AMI. Additional cardiac conditions that increase serum CK and CK-MB in the serum are coronary artery bypass surgery, cardiac transplantation, myocarditis, and pulmonary embolism.[45] Serum CK activity is significantly elevated in all types of muscular dystrophy.[46] In Duchenne sex-linked muscular dystrophy, enzyme activity is highest in childhood and may be elevated long before clinical signs appear, especially during infancy (7 to 10 years of age).

Serum CK activity decreases as patients age, and the mass of functioning muscles diminishes with the progression of the disease. About 50% to 80% of the asymptomatic female carriers of Duchenne dystrophy show threefold to sixfold increases in CK activity.[47][48] High CK values are noted in viral myositis, polymyositis, and similar muscle diseases. However, serum enzyme activity is not increased in neurogenic muscle diseases like myasthenia gravis, multiple sclerosis, poliomyelitis, and parkinsonism.[49] Patients with Alzheimer disease and Pick disease may have decreased CK activity in the brain. The BB-CK activity is primarily decreased in these patients, resulting in an overall decrease in total CK activity.[50]

CK levels also rise in patients with rhabdomyolysis.[51] Rhabdomyolysis may result from a crush injury, drug use, viral infections, and strenuous exercise. The condition typically presents with muscle pain, weakness, and dark-colored urine. A breakdown of skeletal muscle is usually seen, releasing CK, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and electrolytes.[52] The reason for the dark urine is due to myoglobinuria. A CK level that increases to more than 1000 IU/L indicates rhabdomyolysis; values over 5000 IU/L indicate severe rhabdomyolysis.

Patients with sickle cell trait who start a new strenuous exercise program such as spin class are also at an increased risk of rhabdomyolysis, with reported CK levels higher than 70000 IU/L in some cases.[53] The most common complication resulting from rhabdomyolysis is acute kidney injury.[54] Any patient with suspected rhabdomyolysis should receive prompt treatment with IV fluids to preserve kidney function.[55]

Patients on statins such as simvastatin may have an adverse effect of significantly elevated CK levels, potentially leading to rhabdomyolysis.[56] This risk increases if the patient takes a drug that inhibits cytochrome P450-3A4 (CYP3A4).[57] Some common medications to avoid in patients on statin therapy include clarithromycin, erythromycin, verapamil, tamoxifen, and antifungal agents.[56]

Low levels of CK can be present in patients with connective tissue diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus. Low levels may be seen in patients with reduced physical activity, such as elderly bedridden patients.[58] A low level of serum CK is associated with an increased risk of death in a CKD population.[59] A CK before the start of peritoneal dialysis between 111 and 179 IU/L is associated with a lower risk of death.[60]

Serum CK activity demonstrates an inverse relationship with thyroid activity. About 60% of hypothyroid subjects show an average elevation of CK activity fivefold more than the upper reference limit.[61] The major isoenzyme is CK-MM, suggesting muscular involvement. In subclinical hypothyroidism, some degree of dysfunction is evident in skeletal muscle metabolism.[62][63]

Strenuous, prolonged exercise results in large increases in serum CK.[64] In untrained persons, serum CK appears to increase proportionately to the duration and intensity of the exercise; however, conditioned persons show smaller changes. Sustained exercise increases the CK-MB content of skeletal muscle, owing to the phenomenon of “fetal reversion,” where fetal patterns of protein synthesis reappear.[65][66] Thus, serum CK-MB isoenzyme may increase in such circumstances. This explanation may also account for the elevated CK-MB values sometimes observed in chronic renal failure (uremic myopathy).[67]

Plasma CK activity is significantly associated with blood pressure in the general population and is thought to contribute to hypertension by increasing vascular contractility and renal sodium retention.[68][69] Similar to the association in the general population, plasma CK activity measured in early pregnancy is associated with blood pressure during pregnancy.[70] Plasma CK activity is also associated with severe gestational hypertension diagnosed before 34 weeks of gestation but not with preeclampsia or HELLP, which suggests differences in pathophysiology.[71] 

Quality Control and Lab Safety

A quality management system (QMS) is essential for laboratory tests to ensure accuracy, reliability, and timeliness. Poor QMS can lead to unwarranted treatment or complications, delayed diagnoses, and unnecessary follow-up, among other consequences.[72] A QMS framework provides the laboratory with a set of essential building blocks, including well-defined objectives, standards, and procedures concerning quality management, employee training, education, calibration, maintenance of lab equipment, raw material or test sample handling, instrumentation and control processes, laboratory safety, and records management and reporting.[73] Neglecting these elements can compromise the laboratory quality management system (LQMS), leading to inaccurate laboratory results, barriers to regulatory compliance, and lowered customer expectations.[74]

Quality control (QC), often called internal quality control, involves continuously monitoring a measurement procedure to ensure that results obtained from patient samples adhere to performance criteria suitable for patient care.[75] QC plays a crucial role in recognizing and addressing any error conditions. When the result of a QC material falls within acceptable limits of the expected value, this confirms the stability and functioning of the measurement procedure, enabling a higher confidence level in reporting patient sample results.

Conversely, suppose a QC result falls outside the acceptable limits. In that case, the QC result signals a potential malfunction in the measurement procedure, indicating a likelihood that patient sample results might not be suitable for clinical use, necessitating corrective measures.[76] In cases where corrective action is required, patient sample measurements should be re-evaluated when the measurement procedure has been restored to ensure stable and accurate performance. When erroneous results have been reported before identifying the error condition, issuing a corrected report is necessary.

The quality control materials are measured periodically along with patient samples.[77] For non-waived tests, laboratory regulations require, at the minimum, analysis of at least 2 levels of control materials every 24 hours. Laboratories can assay QC samples more frequently to ensure accurate results. Quality control samples should be assayed after calibration or maintenance of an analyzer to verify the correct method performance.[78] To reduce the frequency of quality control (QC) when conducting tests that require fewer checks than those mandated by regulatory agencies (eg, monthly), laboratories can create an Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP). This involves conducting a risk assessment of all potential sources of error throughout the testing process and implementing a QC plan to minimize the likelihood of errors.[79] 

The Levey-Jennings plot is the most commonly used format for evaluating QC results.[80] This format presents each QC result chronologically, offering a quick visual means to evaluate performance. When the measurement procedure adheres to stable conditions per specifications, the mean value is the targeted or expected value for the QC result. Concurrently, the standard deviation (SD) lines illustrate the expected level of imprecision. Under the assumption of a Gaussian (normal) distribution of imprecision, the results should demonstrate an even distribution around the mean, with occurrences more frequently observed closer to the mean than at the distribution's extremes.[81] Westgard multi-rules are used to evaluate the quality control runs. In case of any rule violation, proper corrective and preventive action should be enforced before patient testing.    

Laboratories are required to participate in external quality control or proficiency testing (PT) programs as mandated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) regulations.[82] Participating in the PT program is beneficial as this guarantees the precision and reliability of the laboratory's results compared to other labs conducting similar assays. CMS and voluntary accreditation organizations oversee mandatory participation and results evaluation. The PT plan should be included in the quality assessment (QA) plan and the laboratory's overall quality program.[83]

Every clinical laboratory should establish and uphold a formal safety program as its top priority. This program forms the foundation for ensuring patients' and laboratory staff's safety and well-being. The program provides a structured framework for recognizing, lessening, and controlling potential hazards linked with laboratory activities. The laboratory significantly diminishes the chances of errors, incidents, and exposure to unsafe materials through strict adherence to safety protocols.[84]

Protective barriers, such as gloves, masks, protective eyewear, and gowns, must be employed when collecting patient specimens. Disposable gloves from nonsterile latex or alternative materials offering adequate barrier protection should be utilized. Phlebotomists must change gloves when moving between blood draws from different patients. Additionally, hand hygiene protocols are important when gloves are changed.[85] Lab technicians should wear facial protection and protective clothing to minimize the risk of exposure to blood or bodily fluids. They should also minimize syringe use and dispose of needles safely in rigid containers. After leaving the lab, they should remove all protective gear.[86]

According to OSHA regulations, employees at risk of exposure should be offered the hepatitis B vaccine as part of their regular or occasional duties. Per the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, medical technologists, phlebotomists, and pathologists are recommended to receive the hepatitis B vaccine. Consequently, the obligation is to provide, at the very least, these laboratory employees with the choice to accept the hepatitis B vaccine at no cost.[87]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) or creatine kinase (CK) is essential in diagnosing acute rhabdomyolysis or AMI and chronic conditions such as sickle cell disease. As such, several clinicians may provide their diagnostic interpretation of an individual patient. An interprofessional team consisting of a nephrologist, surgeon, and nurse may manage the condition in a patient who presents with rhabdomyolysis after an increased CK level. The nephrologist strives to improve kidney function in such patients, as acute kidney injury is the most common complication of rhabdomyolysis. The surgeon may need to surgically repair any damaged muscle or tissue that leads to the condition. The nurse should teach the patient about managing their condition and avoiding exacerbating or triggering rhabdomyolysis.

The healthcare team can consult with the pharmacist to verify that any patient's medications are not potential sources for elevated CK.[88] Any hospital staff working in the emergency department should know that intravenous fluid therapy is started promptly to curb acute kidney injury in patients with suspected rhabdomyolysis.[89]

Review Questions

Creatine Kinase Levels After a Myocardial Infarction

Figure

Creatine Kinase Levels After a Myocardial Infarction. Creatine kinase levels after myocardial infarction are compared to levels of myoglobin and troponin. Contributed by O Chaigasame, MD

References

1.
Moghadam-Kia S, Oddis CV, Aggarwal R. Approach to asymptomatic creatine kinase elevation. Cleve Clin J Med. 2016 Jan;83(1):37-42. [PMC free article: PMC4871266] [PubMed: 26760521]
2.
McLeish MJ, Kenyon GL. Relating structure to mechanism in creatine kinase. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2005 Jan-Feb;40(1):1-20. [PubMed: 15804623]
3.
Morandi L, Angelini C, Prelle A, Pini A, Grassi B, Bernardi G, Politano L, Bruno C, De Grandis D, Cudia P, Citterio A. High plasma creatine kinase: review of the literature and proposal for a diagnostic algorithm. Neurol Sci. 2006 Nov;27(5):303-11. [PubMed: 17122938]
4.
Takagi Y, Yasuhara T, Gomi K. [Creatine kinase and its isozymes]. Rinsho Byori. 2001 Nov;Suppl 116:52-61. [PubMed: 11797380]
5.
Levy M, Heels-Ansdell D, Hiralal R, Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Yusuf S, Cook D, Villar JC, McQueen M, McFalls E, Filipovic M, Schünemann H, Sear J, Foex P, Lim W, Landesberg G, Godet G, Poldermans D, Bursi F, Kertai MD, Bhatnagar N, Devereaux PJ. Prognostic value of troponin and creatine kinase muscle and brain isoenzyme measurement after noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2011 Apr;114(4):796-806. [PubMed: 21336095]
6.
Nakamura Y, Ito K, Takemura N, Inagaki F, Mihara F, Kokudo N. Elevation in creatine kinase isoenzyme-MM associated with hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report and review of literature. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr;15(2):460-466. [PubMed: 35199319]
7.
Schlattner U, Tokarska-Schlattner M, Wallimann T. Mitochondrial creatine kinase in human health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Feb;1762(2):164-80. [PubMed: 16236486]
8.
Keceli G, Gupta A, Sourdon J, Gabr R, Schär M, Dey S, Tocchetti CG, Stuber A, Agrimi J, Zhang Y, Leppo M, Steenbergen C, Lai S, Yanek LR, O'Rourke B, Gerstenblith G, Bottomley PA, Wang Y, Paolocci N, Weiss RG. Mitochondrial Creatine Kinase Attenuates Pathologic Remodeling in Heart Failure. Circ Res. 2022 Mar 04;130(5):741-759. [PMC free article: PMC8897235] [PubMed: 35109669]
9.
Dolder M, Wendt S, Wallimann T. Mitochondrial creatine kinase in contact sites: interaction with porin and adenine nucleotide translocase, role in permeability transition and sensitivity to oxidative damage. Biol Signals Recept. 2001 Jan-Apr;10(1-2):93-111. [PubMed: 11223643]
10.
Schlattner U, Kay L, Tokarska-Schlattner M. Mitochondrial Proteolipid Complexes of Creatine Kinase. Subcell Biochem. 2018;87:365-408. [PubMed: 29464567]
11.
Schlattner U, Tokarska-Schlattner M, Ramirez S, Brückner A, Kay L, Polge C, Epand RF, Lee RM, Lacombe ML, Epand RM. Mitochondrial kinases and their molecular interaction with cardiolipin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Oct;1788(10):2032-47. [PubMed: 19409873]
12.
Panteghini M. Serum isoforms of creatine kinase isoenzymes. Clin Biochem. 1988 Aug;21(4):211-8. [PubMed: 3044646]
13.
Wallimann T, Tokarska-Schlattner M, Schlattner U. The creatine kinase system and pleiotropic effects of creatine. Amino Acids. 2011 May;40(5):1271-96. [PMC free article: PMC3080659] [PubMed: 21448658]
14.
Chattington P, Clarke D, Neithercut WD. Creatine kinase isoform electrophoresis for the early confirmation of myocardial infarction detected by timed sequential CK slope analysis. Postgrad Med J. 1994 Nov;70(829):805-8. [PMC free article: PMC2397833] [PubMed: 7824414]
15.
Wyness SP, Hunsaker JJ, La'ulu SL, Rao LV, Roberts WL. Detection of macro-creatine kinase and macroamylase by polyethylene glycol precipitation and ultrafiltration methods. Clin Chim Acta. 2011 Nov 20;412(23-24):2052-7. [PubMed: 21276785]
16.
Davidson DF, Scott JG. Detection of creatine kinase macroenzymes. Ann Clin Biochem. 2012 Sep;49(Pt 5):482-5. [PubMed: 22896659]
17.
Eidizadeh A, von Ahsen N, Friedewald S, Binder L. Macro-CK type 2 in metastatic prostate cancer. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Aug 27;6(3):307-309. [PubMed: 30412465]
18.
Shen YQ, Tang L, Zhou HM, Lin ZJ. Structure of human muscle creatine kinase. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2001 Aug;57(Pt 8):1196-200. [PubMed: 11517911]
19.
Schumann G, Bonora R, Ceriotti F, Clerc-Renaud P, Ferrero CA, Férard G, Franck PF, Gella FJ, Hoelzel W, Jørgensen PJ, Kanno T, Kessne A, Klauker R, Kristiansen N, Lessinger JM, Linsinger TP, Misaki H, Panteghini M, Pauwels J, Schimmel HG, Vialle A, Weidemann G, Siekmann L. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C. Part 2. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of creatine kinase. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002 Jun;40(6):635-42. [PubMed: 12211662]
20.
Lippi G, von Meyer A, Cadamuro J, Simundic AM. Blood sample quality. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Mar 26;6(1):25-31. [PubMed: 29794250]
21.
Giavarina D, Lippi G. Blood venous sample collection: Recommendations overview and a checklist to improve quality. Clin Biochem. 2017 Jul;50(10-11):568-573. [PubMed: 28242283]
22.
Simundic AM, Baird G, Cadamuro J, Costelloe SJ, Lippi G. Managing hemolyzed samples in clinical laboratories. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2020 Jan;57(1):1-21. [PubMed: 31603708]
23.
Vivekanandan S, Swaminathan R. Clinically effective CK-MB reporting: how to do it? J Postgrad Med. 2010 Jul-Sep;56(3):226-8. [PubMed: 20739777]
24.
Recommended method for the determination of creatine kinase in blood. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1976 Dec;36(8):711-23. [PubMed: 1031483]
25.
Kanemitsu F, Okigaki T. Creatine kinase isoenzymes. J Chromatogr. 1988 Jul 29;429:399-417. [PubMed: 3062028]
26.
Chen A, Wong SS. Differentiation of creatine kinase MB and IgA-linked BB isoenzymes on electrophoresis. FEBS Lett. 1987 Apr 06;214(1):192-4. [PubMed: 3494633]
27.
Ogunro EA, Hearse DJ, Shillingford JP. Creatine kinase isoenzymes: their separation and quantitation. Cardiovasc Res. 1977 Mar;11(2):94-102. [PubMed: 870200]
28.
Laurino JP, Fischberg-Bender E, Galligan S, Chang J. An immunochemical mass assay for the direct measurement of creatine kinase MB2. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1995 May-Jun;25(3):252-63. [PubMed: 7605108]
29.
Wu AH, Smith A, Christenson RH, Murakami MM, Apple FS. Evaluation of a point-of-care assay for cardiac markers for patients suspected of acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Aug 16;346(2):211-9. [PubMed: 15256323]
30.
Marwah SA, Shah H, Chauhan K, Trivedi A, Haridas N. Comparison of Mass Versus Activity of Creatine Kinase MB and Its Utility in the Early Diagnosis of Re-infarction. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2014 Apr;29(2):161-6. [PMC free article: PMC3990811] [PubMed: 24757297]
31.
Seo H, Miyazaki S, Furuno T, Nonogi H, Haze K, Hiramori K. Creatine kinase-MB protein mass is a better indicator for the assessment of acute myocardial infarction in the lower range of creatine kinase level. Jpn Heart J. 1993 Nov;34(6):717-27. [PubMed: 8164339]
32.
Obzansky D, Lott JA. Clinical evaluation of an immunoinhibition procedure for creatine kinase-MB. Clin Chem. 1980 Jan;26(1):150-2. [PubMed: 7356551]
33.
Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Brocco G, Guidi GC. Influence of hemolysis on routine clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(3):311-6. [PubMed: 16519604]
34.
Hedayati M, Razavi SA, Boroomand S, Kheradmand Kia S. The impact of pre-analytical variations on biochemical analytes stability: A systematic review. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Dec;34(12):e23551. [PMC free article: PMC7755813] [PubMed: 32869910]
35.
Timonen A, Lloyd-Puryear M, Hougaard DM, Meriö L, Mäkinen P, Laitala V, Pölönen T, Skogstrand K, Kennedy A, Airenne S, Polari H, Korpimäki T. Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Newborn Screening: Evaluation of a New GSP® Neonatal Creatine Kinase-MM Kit in a US and Danish Population. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2019 Sep;5(3):27. [PMC free article: PMC7510235] [PubMed: 33072986]
36.
Zaninotto M, Mion MM, Novello E, Delprete E, Moretti M, Plebani M. Creatine-kinase MB mass: age and sex-associated reference limits in two different platforms that use the same method. Clin Chim Acta. 2009 Mar;401(1-2):162-4. [PubMed: 19101529]
37.
Stäubli M, Roessler B, Köchli HP, Peheim E, Straub PW. Creatine kinase and creatine kinase MB in endurance runners and in patients with myocardial infarction. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985;54(1):40-5. [PubMed: 4018053]
38.
el Allaf M, Chapelle JP, el Allaf D, Adam A, Faymonville ME, Laurent P, Heusghem C. Differentiating muscle damage from myocardial injury by means of the serum creatine kinase (CK) isoenzyme MB mass measurement/total CK activity ratio. Clin Chem. 1986 Feb;32(2):291-5. [PubMed: 3510780]
39.
Wolfson D, Lindberg E, Su L, Farber SJ, Dubin SB. Three rapid immunoassays for the determination of creatine kinase MB: an analytical, clinical, and interpretive evaluation. Am Heart J. 1991 Oct;122(4 Pt 1):958-64. [PubMed: 1927882]
40.
Mathey D, Bleifeld W, Buss H, Hanrath P. Creatine kinase release in acute myocardial infarction: correlation with clinical, electrocardiographic, and pathological findings. Br Heart J. 1975 Nov;37(11):1161-8. [PMC free article: PMC482934] [PubMed: 1191432]
41.
Apple FS. Diagnostic use of CK-MM and CK-MB isoforms for detecting myocardial infarction. Clin Lab Med. 1989 Dec;9(4):643-54. [PubMed: 2686906]
42.
Tricoci P, Leonardi S. Determining myocardial infarction after PCI: CK-MB, troponin, both, or neither? MLO Med Lab Obs. 2015 Jan;47(1):14, 16. [PubMed: 26281113]
43.
Sadoh WE, Eregie CO, Nwaneri DU, Sadoh AE. The diagnostic value of both troponin T and creatinine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB) in detecting combined renal and myocardial injuries in asphyxiated infants. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91338. [PMC free article: PMC3953387] [PubMed: 24625749]
44.
Puleo PR, Meyer D, Wathen C, Tawa CB, Wheeler S, Hamburg RJ, Ali N, Obermueller SD, Triana JF, Zimmerman JL. Use of a rapid assay of subforms of creatine kinase MB to diagnose or rule out acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1994 Sep 01;331(9):561-6. [PubMed: 7702648]
45.
Chaitman BR, Alexander KP, Cyr DD, Berger JS, Reynolds HR, Bangalore S, Boden WE, Lopes RD, Demkow M, Piero Perna G, Riezebos RK, McFalls EO, Banerjee S, Bagai A, Gosselin G, O'Brien SM, Rockhold FW, Waters DD, Thygesen KA, Stone GW, White HD, Maron DJ, Hochman JS., ISCHEMIA Research Group. Myocardial Infarction in the ISCHEMIA Trial: Impact of Different Definitions on Incidence, Prognosis, and Treatment Comparisons. Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):790-804. [PMC free article: PMC7902479] [PubMed: 33267610]
46.
Han S, Xu H, Zheng J, Sun J, Feng X, Wang Y, Ye W, Ke Q, Ren Y, Yao S, Zhang S, Chen J, Griggs RC, Zhao Z, Qi M, Gatheridge MA. Population-Wide Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Carrier Detection by CK and Molecular Testing. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8396429. [PMC free article: PMC7537677] [PubMed: 33029525]
47.
Zheng J, Han S, Ye W, Yao S, Qi M, Chen J, Xu H. [Carrier screening model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy for women of reproductive age based on a pre-pregnancy birth defect control platform]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2021 May 10;38(5):485-487. [PubMed: 33974262]
48.
Gatheridge MA, Kwon JM, Mendell JM, Scheuerbrandt G, Moat SJ, Eyskens F, Rockman-Greenberg C, Drousiotou A, Griggs RC. Identifying Non-Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy-Positive and False Negative Results in Prior Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Newborn Screening Programs: A Review. JAMA Neurol. 2016 Jan;73(1):111-6. [PubMed: 26594870]
49.
Lee T, Tokunaga S, Taniguchi N, Misaki M, Shimomura H, Nishino I, Itoh K, Takeshima Y. Underlying diseases in sporadic presentation of high creatine kinase levels in girls. Clin Chim Acta. 2021 Aug;519:198-203. [PubMed: 33965408]
50.
Finsterer J, Stöllberger C, Krugluger W. Significance of CK-elevation in noncompaction with regard to cardiac and neuromuscular disease. Int J Cardiol. 2008 Nov 12;130(2):174-9. [PubMed: 18055044]
51.
Khan FY. Rhabdomyolysis: a review of the literature. Neth J Med. 2009 Oct;67(9):272-83. [PubMed: 19841484]
52.
Chatzizisis YS, Misirli G, Hatzitolios AI, Giannoglou GD. The syndrome of rhabdomyolysis: complications and treatment. Eur J Intern Med. 2008 Dec;19(8):568-74. [PubMed: 19046720]
53.
Sauret JM, Marinides G, Wang GK. Rhabdomyolysis. Am Fam Physician. 2002 Mar 01;65(5):907-12. [PubMed: 11898964]
54.
Brattebø G, Fredriksen K, Wisborg T. [Prevention of acute renal failure in muscular injuries]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1992 Aug 10;112(18):2370-2. [PubMed: 1412240]
55.
Altintepe L, Guney I, Tonbul Z, Türk S, Mazi M, Ağca E, Yeksan M. Early and intensive fluid replacement prevents acute renal failure in the crush cases associated with spontaneous collapse of an apartment in Konya. Ren Fail. 2007;29(6):737-41. [PubMed: 17763170]
56.
van Staa TP, Carr DF, O'Meara H, McCann G, Pirmohamed M. Predictors and outcomes of increases in creatine phosphokinase concentrations or rhabdomyolysis risk during statin treatment. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Sep;78(3):649-59. [PMC free article: PMC4243915] [PubMed: 24602118]
57.
Mogyorósi A, Bradley B, Showalter A, Schubert ML. Rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure due to combination therapy with simvastatin and warfarin. J Intern Med. 1999 Dec;246(6):599-602. [PubMed: 10620105]
58.
Wei N, Pavlidis N, Tsokos G, Elin RJ, Plotz PH. Clinical significance of low creatine phosphokinase values in patients with connective tissue diseases. JAMA. 1981 Oct 23-30;246(17):1921-3. [PubMed: 7288967]
59.
Flahault A, Metzger M, Chassé JF, Haymann JP, Boffa JJ, Flamant M, Vrtovsnik F, Houillier P, Stengel B, Thervet E, Pallet N., NephroTest study group. Low Serum Creatine Kinase Level Predicts Mortality in Patients with a Chronic Kidney Disease. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0156433. [PMC free article: PMC4889148] [PubMed: 27248151]
60.
Wu X, Zhou L, Zhan X, Wen Y, Wang X, Feng X, Wang N, Peng F, Wu J. Creatine Kinase and Mortality in Peritoneal Dialysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:855891. [PMC free article: PMC9127078] [PubMed: 35620514]
61.
McGrowder DA, Fraser YP, Gordon L, Crawford TV, Rawlins JM. Serum creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase activities in patients with thyroid disorders. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011 Oct-Dec;14(4):454-9. [PubMed: 22248949]
62.
Beyer IW, Karmali R, Demeester-Mirkine N, Cogan E, Fuss MJ. Serum creatine kinase levels in overt and subclinical hypothyroidism. Thyroid. 1998 Nov;8(11):1029-31. [PubMed: 9848718]
63.
Hekimsoy Z, Oktem IK. Serum creatine kinase levels in overt and subclinical hypothyroidism. Endocr Res. 2005;31(3):171-5. [PubMed: 16392619]
64.
Koch AJ, Pereira R, Machado M. The creatine kinase response to resistance exercise. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2014 Mar;14(1):68-77. [PubMed: 24583542]
65.
Brancaccio P, Maffulli N, Limongelli FM. Creatine kinase monitoring in sport medicine. Br Med Bull. 2007;81-82:209-30. [PubMed: 17569697]
66.
Pedersen ES, Tengesdal S, Radtke M, Langlo KAR. Major increase in creatine kinase after intensive exercise. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2019 Apr 09;139(7) [PubMed: 30969059]
67.
Caravaca F, Gonzales B, Bayo MÁ, Luna E. Musculoskeletal pain in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nefrologia. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(4):433-40. [PubMed: 27267921]
68.
Brewster LM, Mairuhu G, Bindraban NR, Koopmans RP, Clark JF, van Montfrans GA. Creatine kinase activity is associated with blood pressure. Circulation. 2006 Nov 07;114(19):2034-9. [PubMed: 17075013]
69.
Johnsen SH, Lilleng H, Wilsgaard T, Bekkelund SI. Creatine kinase activity and blood pressure in a normal population: the Tromsø study. J Hypertens. 2011 Jan;29(1):36-42. [PubMed: 21063205]
70.
Horjus DL, Bokslag A, Hutten BA, van den Born BH, Middeldorp S, Vrijkotte TGM. Creatine kinase is associated with blood pressure during pregnancy. J Hypertens. 2019 Jul;37(7):1467-1474. [PubMed: 31145714]
71.
Horjus DL, Bokslag A, Hooijberg F, Hutten BA, Middeldorp S, de Groot CJM. Creatine kinase and blood pressure in women with a history of early-onset preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019 Jan;15:118-122. [PubMed: 30825907]
72.
Allen LC. Role of a quality management system in improving patient safety - laboratory aspects. Clin Biochem. 2013 Sep;46(13-14):1187-93. [PubMed: 23648455]
73.
Yao K, McKinney B, Murphy A, Rotz P, Wafula W, Sendagire H, Okui S, Nkengasong JN. Improving quality management systems of laboratories in developing countries: an innovative training approach to accelerate laboratory accreditation. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010 Sep;134(3):401-9. [PubMed: 20716796]
74.
Carey RB, Bhattacharyya S, Kehl SC, Matukas LM, Pentella MA, Salfinger M, Schuetz AN. Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Implementing a Quality Management System in the Medical Microbiology Laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018 Jul;31(3) [PMC free article: PMC6056841] [PubMed: 29720490]
75.
Westgard JO. Internal quality control: planning and implementation strategies. Ann Clin Biochem. 2003 Nov;40(Pt 6):593-611. [PubMed: 14629798]
76.
Mrazek C, Lippi G, Keppel MH, Felder TK, Oberkofler H, Haschke-Becher E, Cadamuro J. Errors within the total laboratory testing process, from test selection to medical decision-making - A review of causes, consequences, surveillance and solutions. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2020 Jun 15;30(2):020502. [PMC free article: PMC7271754] [PubMed: 32550813]
77.
van Rossum HH. Technical quality assurance and quality control for medical laboratories: a review and proposal of a new concept to obtain integrated and validated QA/QC plans. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2022 Dec;59(8):586-600. [PubMed: 35758201]
78.
Kinns H, Pitkin S, Housley D, Freedman DB. Internal quality control: best practice. J Clin Pathol. 2013 Dec;66(12):1027-32. [PubMed: 24072731]
79.
Badrick T. Integrating quality control and external quality assurance. Clin Biochem. 2021 Sep;95:15-27. [PubMed: 33965412]
80.
Liao CM, Lin CM, Kuo CC, Chen MS, Huang CY, Lin CY. Adjusting Quality Control Chart Limits for WBC, RBC, Hb, and PLT Counts to Reduce Daily Control Risks in Hospital Laboratory. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13:3039-3049. [PMC free article: PMC7751786] [PubMed: 33364865]
81.
Coskun A. Modified Levey-Jennings charts for calculated laboratory tests. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(4):387-90. [PubMed: 16599829]
82.
Bayat H. Selecting multi-rule quality control procedures based on patient risk. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Oct 26;55(11):1702-1708. [PubMed: 28236626]
83.
Earley MC, Astles JR, Breckenridge K. Practices and Perceived Value of Proficiency Testing in Clinical Laboratories. J Appl Lab Med. 2017 Jan;1(4):415-420. [PMC free article: PMC6941662] [PubMed: 31903445]
84.
Nemchin RG, Brusick DJ. Basic principles of laboratory safety. Environ Mutagen. 1985;7(6):947-70. [PubMed: 4065066]
85.
Meisenhelder J, Bursik S, Lunn G, Strober W. Laboratory safety. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2008 Apr;Appendix 2:Appendix 2A. [PubMed: 18428418]
86.
Burnett LC, Lunn G, Coico R. Biosafety: guidelines for working with pathogenic and infectious microorganisms. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2009 May;Chapter 1(1):Unit 1A.1. [PMC free article: PMC7162325] [PubMed: 19412909]
87.
Byrd KK, Lu PJ, Murphy TV. Hepatitis B vaccination coverage among health-care personnel in the United States. Public Health Rep. 2013 Nov-Dec;128(6):498-509. [PMC free article: PMC3804093] [PubMed: 24179261]
88.
Ezad S, Cheema H, Collins N. Statin-induced rhabdomyolysis: a complication of a commonly overlooked drug interaction. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2018 Mar;2018(3):omx104. [PMC free article: PMC5853001] [PubMed: 29593874]
89.
Fry AC, Farrington K. Management of acute renal failure. Postgrad Med J. 2006 Feb;82(964):106-16. [PMC free article: PMC2596697] [PubMed: 16461473]

Disclosure: Ravinder Aujla declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Muhammad Zubair declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Roshan Patel declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.

Bookshelf ID: NBK546624PMID: 31536231

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...