Therapeutic Ultrasound for Lateral Epicondylitis

Original Editor - Maëlle Cormond
Top Contributors - Maëlle Cormond, WikiSysop, Admin and Kim Jackson - Maëlle Cormond, Fien Maesschalck, Mariska Tsjeerdsma, Vicky van Genechten

Ultrasound therapy for lateral epicondylitis

A first study from Greg W. et al says that ultrasonography is probably helpful for lateral epicondylitis . Ultrasonography is thought to have thermal and mechanical effects on the target tissue leading to increased metabolism, circulation, extensibility of connective tissue, and tissue regeneration. The best available data suggest that ultrasonography provides modest pain reduction over one to three months. Exercise appears to be more effective than ultrasonography for pain relief. Combining ultrasonography with deep transverse friction massage or corticosteroids is no better than ultrasonography alone. Ultrasonography should be done two or three times per week with a duration of four to six weeks.

Lin CL et al investigated thirty-four patients (35 elbows), with a mean age of 52.1 years (range, 35-65 years), suffered from symptomatic lateral epicondylitis for more than 6 months and had exhausted nonoperative therapies. They were treated with ultrasonographically guided radiofrequency thermal lesioning (RTL). Patients were followed up at least 6 months by physical examination and 12 months by interview. The intensity of pain was recorded with a visual analog scale (VAS) score. The functional outcome was evaluated using grip strength, the upper limb Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) outcome measure, and the Modified Mayo Clinic Performance Index (MMCPI) for the elbow. The ultrasonographic findings regarding the extensor tendon origin were recorded, as were the complications. Conclusions: Ultrasonographically guided RTL for recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis was found to be a minimally invasive treatment with satisfactory results in this pilot investigation. This innovative method can be considered as an alternative treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis before further surgical intervention.

D'Vaz AP et al. assessed the effectiveness of low-intensity ultrasound therapy (LIUS) vs placebo therapy daily for 12 weeks in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis (LE) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. In this study LIUS was no more effective for a large treatment effect than placebo for recalcitrant LE. 

Öznur Öken et al evaluated the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and to compared these with the effects of brace or ultrasound (US) treatment in tennis elbow. The study design used was a prospective and randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. Fifty-eight outpatients with lateral epicondylitis (9 men, 49 women) were included in the trial. The patients were divided into three groups: 1) brace group—brace plus exercise, 2) ultrasound group—US plus exercise, and 3) laser group—LLLT plus exercise. There were no significant differences between the groups on VAS and grip strength at baseline and at follow-up assessments. The results show that, in patients with lateral epicondylitis, a brace has a shorter beneficial effect than US and laser therapy in reducing pain, and that laser therapy is more effective than the brace and US treatment in improving grip strength.

Schleicher I et al. concluded that during the acute phase ultrasound is helpful.

We can decide that the evidence for the use of ultrasound in the treatment of a Lateral Epicondylitis is still controversial.

References

References will automatically be added here, see adding references tutorial.

</div>